When most people think about a criminal background check, they picture state court records — county-level searches that turn up arrests, convictions, and charges filed within a state's court system. But there's an entire parallel court system that many employers overlook: the federal courts. Federal criminal records are stored completely separately from state records, and a standard county or statewide search will not surface them.

Two Separate Court Systems
The United States operates two distinct criminal court systems that do not share records with one another. State courts handle the vast majority of criminal cases. Federal courts handle offenses that cross state lines, involve federal agencies, or violate federal law — regardless of where the individual was arrested or lived.
Prosecuted by the U.S. Government
- Bank fraud & wire fraud
- Mail fraud
- Cybercrime & computer fraud
- Drug trafficking (interstate)
- Human trafficking
- Tax evasion & IRS violations
- Immigration offenses
- Counterfeiting & forgery
- Federal firearms violations
- Crimes on federal property
Prosecuted by State Government
- Assault & battery
- Theft & burglary
- DUI / DWI
- Drug possession (local)
- Domestic violence
- Vandalism & trespassing
- Disorderly conduct
- State-level white collar crimes
- Most traffic offenses
- Probation violations
Why This Matters for Background Screening
An applicant could have a conviction in federal court for bank fraud or drug trafficking and have an entirely clean record when you search state and county courts. That's not a gap in the system — it's by design. The two court structures were built independently and don't cross-report to each other.
Federal criminal searches are conducted separately through the PACER system (Public Access to Court Electronic Records), which indexes records across all 94 federal judicial districts. These records are typically searched by district — so coverage depends on knowing where a person has lived or worked, just like county searches.
Double Jeopardy & the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine
You might wonder: can someone be prosecuted in both state and federal court for the same conduct? The answer is yes — and it's constitutionally permitted. The Fifth Amendment's double jeopardy protection applies within a single sovereign. Because state and federal governments are considered separate sovereigns, both can prosecute the same underlying conduct under their respective laws without violating double jeopardy protections. This is known as the dual sovereignty doctrine.
In practice, this means a drug trafficking conviction that resulted in a state plea deal may be followed by separate federal charges for the same underlying activity. Both records would exist in their respective court systems.
When to Add a Federal Search
A federal criminal search is worth adding to your standard screening package in the following situations:
- Financial roles — anyone handling money, accounts, or fiduciary responsibilities
- Healthcare positions — federal exclusion lists and Medicare/Medicaid fraud convictions are federal records
- Government contractors — often required by contract or regulation
- Executive hires — senior-level candidates with complex work histories across multiple states
- IT and cybersecurity roles — computer fraud charges are prosecuted federally
- Transportation and logistics — drug trafficking and federal DOT violations
Our recommendation: For most standard employment screening, a county criminal search at current and prior counties of residence is your foundation. Adding a federal search makes sense for financial, executive, healthcare, and government-adjacent roles where federal offenses are a meaningful risk. We can help you build a package that covers the right jurisdictions for the positions you're filling.
Build a Complete Criminal Screening Package
Don't let federal records fall through the cracks. We'll help you cover both state and federal courts for the roles that warrant it.